Quick Answer: North Carolina has a special rule for work-related back injuries. Unlike many other injuries that require proof of an "injury by accident," a back injury may be compensable if it results from a specific traumatic incident that occurred during the course of employment. Because of this distinction, legitimate back injury claims are often easier to prove than injuries involving other parts of the body.
If you have injured your back at work, understanding this difference could determine whether your workers' compensation claim is accepted or denied.
North Carolina's Workers' Compensation Act recognizes a separate legal standard for most back injuries. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6), an employee may recover benefits for a disabling injury to the back that arises out of and in the course of employment if it is the direct result of a specific traumatic incident of the work assigned.
Unlike an injury by accident, a specific traumatic incident does not require an unusual event, a slip, a trip, equipment failure, or some other interruption of your normal work routine.
Instead, you generally must identify a work-related event that occurred during a reasonably identifiable period of time and immediately resulted in your back injury.
Back injuries often occur differently than injuries to other parts of the body.
Many injured workers cannot identify a dramatic accident. Instead, they describe an immediate onset of pain while performing ordinary work activities, such as:
The North Carolina General Assembly recognized that many legitimate back injuries occur this way. Rather than requiring proof of an unexpected accident, the law allows many back injuries to be proven through the specific traumatic incident standard.
The courts have explained that a specific traumatic incident must occur within a "judicially cognizable period of time."
That phrase sounds complicated, but the concept is fairly simple.
You generally do not have to identify the exact minute your injury occurred.
However, you should be able to identify approximately when it happened.
For example:
The important point is that the injury can be tied to a specific work activity occurring during a reasonably identifiable period of time.
The law generally requires more than gradually worsening soreness.
For example, these statements usually present problems:
"My back has been bothering me for several months."
"I don't know when it started. It just gradually got worse."
By contrast, these descriptions are much stronger:
"While lifting a transmission, I immediately felt a pop in my lower back."
"I twisted while moving a patient and instantly developed severe back pain."
The immediate onset of symptoms tied to a specific work activity is often what distinguishes a compensable claim from one that may be denied.
Not every back injury automatically qualifies simply because it happened at work.
The work activity must actually contribute to the injury.
For example, in Jones v. Kidde Technologies, COA12-1463 (2013), an employee was simply walking down a hallway when his back began hurting. The North Carolina Court of Appeals held that the claim was not compensable because the injury did not arise out of the employment.
Likewise, in Chambers v. Transit Management, COA527A05 (2006), the Court explained that the onset of pain alone is not enough. The employee must show that the pain resulted from performing work-related duties or from a risk inherent in the employment.
Simply being present at work when symptoms begin is not always sufficient.
The specific traumatic incident standard only applies to back and neck injuries. If another body part is injured, such as a knee or shoulder, the "injury by accident" standard applies and the burden of proof is higher.
An injury by accident may be established when the employee’s normal work routine is interrupted and unusual conditions are introduced that are likely to produce unexpected consequences. An "accident" is a separate and additional requirement to prove you are entitled to benefits.
A back injury does not require an unusual interruption of the normal work routine. The employee must instead identify a work-related incident occurring within a judicially recognizable period of time.
Imagine two warehouse employees lifting identical fifty-pound boxes.
The first employee feels immediate shoulder pain while performing the lift exactly as he has hundreds of times before.
Because nothing unusual happened, the shoulder injury may not satisfy North Carolina's injury by accident standard.
The second employee performs the same lift but immediately feels a pop in his lower back.
Even though nothing unexpected occurred, that employee may have a compensable claim because North Carolina applies the specific traumatic incident standard.
This distinction often surprises injured workers.
When reporting your injury to your employer, giving a recorded statement, or explaining the injury to your doctor, avoid vague descriptions if more specific facts are available.
For example, saying:
"My back just started hurting."
does not explain what happened.
If it is accurate, a much better description would be:
"While lifting a pallet onto the truck, I immediately felt a pop in my lower back."
You are not trying to use legal terminology or "magic words." You are simply providing a complete and accurate description of what actually occurred.
Insurance adjusters are trained to gather information about your claim, but they are not required to explain the legal significance of the facts or help you identify the information that may support compensability.
One of the biggest misconceptions I hear is, "This job has worn out my back, it should be covered by workers' compensation."
That simply is not true.
North Carolina intentionally created a different legal standard for most back injuries because many legitimate injuries occur during ordinary work activities without any dramatic accident.
The key question is often not whether you slipped or fell, but whether you can identify a specific work activity during which your back injury occurred.
That is why reporting the injury promptly and accurately describing what happened is so important. Small details that may seem unimportant to an injured worker can make a significant difference when the insurance company evaluates the claim.
North Carolina's specific traumatic incident rule makes many legitimate back injury claims easier to prove than other workplace injuries. Unlike an injury by accident, you generally do not have to prove that something unusual interrupted your normal work routine.
However, you still must show that the injury arose out of your employment, occurred during a specific work activity within a reasonably identifiable period of time, and is supported by competent medical evidence.
If your workers' compensation claim has been denied because the insurance company disputes how your back injury occurred, an experienced attorney can review the facts and determine whether your injury satisfies North Carolina's specific traumatic incident standard.
For a more detailed explanation of the North Carolina workers compensation claims process, read Galbavy Law’s dedicated page that covers a broad range of workers' compensation issues.
Galbavy Law represents injured workers throughout North Carolina and is led by a North Carolina Board Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law.
This article is intended for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every workers' compensation claim depends on its own facts, medical evidence, and applicable North Carolina law.
Quick Answer: Under North Carolina workers’ compensation law, an injury by accident generally requires an...
Many injured workers are surprised to learn that not every injury that happens at work...
Quick Answer Yes, in the sense that an insurance company may hire an investigator to...
1 Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases because each case is unique and must be evaluated separately. The only way we can assist you is for you to call us about your case.
Protected by reCAPTCHA. Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
